Signs that tell of “omicron” being a different condition to Covid-19

It beggars belief that UK Government is getting away with its† “omicron” hoaxery when it, through its agents, announces that the condition doesn’t produce the same symptoms as does “Covid-19”. Indeed, the way that it is generally being talked about as an illness defined by a new name, it would be natural for an observer of this phenomenon to gain an impression that “omicron” was being used as an identifier disconnected from “Covid-19”. And this is interesting, because as it happens, there are many signs to suggest that “omicron” is not Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) – or, not Covid-19. This is enormously significant because it doesn’t just entail a moving of goalposts to maintain the economic blockade (“lockdown”), but a replacing of them with a different sort of frame suited to a completely different game which involves an entirely different way of scoring.

Consider two very recent reports from corporate-media. The first extract is from the North East Chronicle, entitled, Omicron not producing the ‘classic three’ Covid symptoms, latest data suggests:

The Omicron variant is not producing the ‘classic three’ symptoms associated with previous Covid strains, the latest data suggests… The analysis revealed that only 50% of people experienced the classic three symptoms of fever, cough, or loss of sense of smell or taste.

The following is from the Independent, entitled, Omicron symptoms: What to look out for from new Covid variant.

The common cold is caused by a different strain of virus to Covid-19. But with the rapidly-spreading Omicron variant often causing mild symptoms, such as stuffy nose, sore head and sore throat, it is very hard to tell the difference without testing.

What this all speaks to is the actual occurrence of mild seasonal illness being reattributed to “Covid-19”, but in its milder form, “omicron”, so that the pretence of a pandemic can be maintained. However, in real terms, if “omicron” produces different symptoms to Covid-19, then here is foundation for a case to make that dissociates the two.

In the Chronicle’s article (which is mouthing the Daily Express, it appears), the symptoms of “omicron” are given as runny nose, headache, fatigue (mild or severe), sneezing and sore throat. The Independent’s list of symptoms is more or less the same, except fatigue doesn’t feature, and there is the inclusion of loss of smell, and persistent cough. We notice that the additions make the symptom list more like “classic” “Covid-19”. We should be able to see by now, reader, why it is very important to try and keep this consistent.

And so, one suspects that there is an editorial version of a truth in the Independent’s list of symptoms, which suits its apparent purpose of reporting that the cloth for the Emperor’s new suit of clothes is still real in the (empty) loom that it is being weaved on: just look at the way the article develops:

Professor Tim Spector, from Britain’s ZOE Covid app, said it was more important than ever to get tested even without symptoms.

He said that data from the ZOE study app suggests that about half of all cases of Delta are being “missed” because they are not presenting with “classic” Covid symptoms of fever, new and persistent cough and a loss or change of smell or taste.

“Omicron is probably more, much more similar to the mild variants we’re seeing in people who have been vaccinated with Delta than anything else,” he said.

“And so it is going to be producing cold-like symptoms that people won’t recognise as Covid if they just believe the official government advice.”

If the reader doesn’t know (and the author didn’t), ZOE is a phone application where people can report symptoms. When one processes what is being said by this technocrat (and invisible clothes swindler) attached to a “study” of the data produced by said survey, it appears there is a school of official thought whereby those who are “vaccinated” and contract “Covid-19” have milder symptoms because what is at work in these bodies are the mild variants, such as “omicron”, or an older variant with reduced capability.

To put it another way, “vaccines” explain the different symptoms now being experienced because of how they achieve the winkling out of the previous and stronger variant, or achieve its poorer performance in a host.

However, there are a couple of objections to make, and both of them will take some considerable explanation.

Firstly, there is an objection based on how SARS is caused, and how the “vaccine” actually does nothing to prevent the mechanics of it.

At the crux of SARS (now being called Covid-19) is ACE2, a protein that doesn’t appear to have to be naturally occurring, given that it was a thing newly discovered this century, and given that levels of its expression are variable and, for instance, contingent on a body ingesting medicines for hypertension. ACE2 does not propagate the disease by itself. In the lung, when the SARS microbe encounters ACE2, it binds to it, and causes clogging. As FBEL has reported, this has been recognised in some expert quarters as organising pneumonia (see Covid-19 Is Pneumonia – Everything Else Is Lies). This condition is the full and proper expression of what is now being called Covid-19, and it is right to say that it is in fact caused by ACE2 (for if ACE2 levels can be varied, we can envisage SARS coronavirus inhabiting the lung harmlessly when there is none of the other component present to trigger the condition).

And so, the story of a difference in any “viral load” of SARS being the essential instrument at the root of a case of Covid-19 is misdirection in any case.

That being said, let us imagine that the “vaccine” does what we are told it does, and produces a fast-acting immune response to lessen viral load. In the official model of Covid-19 infection, the “virus” meets the upper respiratory tract and produces a first point of invasion. If this is where an infection is being quickly snuffed out with antibodies, then it explains why there is no further development into the lung.

However, this doesn’t explain why the uninhibited viral load of a new variant, which a “vaccine” is not designed to deal with, can only produce milder cases. Right here is the territory of “omicron” not doing what is claimed for a SARS coronavirus.

But not to get ahead of ourselves, let the focus remain awhile on the fact (despite its orthodoxy) that it is controversial to say that an infection in the upper respiratory tract is connected to Covid-19, because of a problem regarding how it would be carried to those parts of the lung where it can demonstrate itself as being a case of SARS. This is covered in the FBEL article, Covid-19 is not flu, and the reader should consult that. Basically, it is argued that Covid-19 must be seeded with a direct transmission through the respiratory tract to the lung.

As such, all general flu-like symptoms that aren’t related to the organising pneumonia (so, when they are, they are in fact signs of immune response) should actually be understood to be symptomatic of cases of cold and flu. Of course, it has been the deliberate counting of this illness as “Covid-19” that has helped to give the impression of a prevalent disease.

Ultimately, symptoms of “omicron” that can be mistaken as cold are the same sort that should not have driven the narrative of a Covid-19 pandemic. So, in fact, the issue is moot.

On the other hand (and this is the second objection told of above), the apparent emerging fact that “omicron” isn’t good at infecting the lung suggests that it should be taken on the face value of its symptoms, and should be considered a reattributed seasonal illness that is not Covid-19.

Consider the following from a 16th December Daily Mail article, with the rather lengthy title, Is THIS why Omicron is spreading so rapidly? Study claims ultra-infectious variant replicates in airways 70 TIMES quicker than Delta… but it struggles when it reaches the lungs in more proof it may be milder:

The Omicron variant multiplies 70 times faster than Delta in the airways, according to a study.

Hong Kong University researchers also found the new variant replicates 10 times slower in the lungs than predecessors.

The finding may explain why the mutant virus is spreading at a ferocious pace, and also lends weight to the theory it is milder than the past variants, something which doctors in South Africa have been claiming for weeks.

The researchers exposed lung tissue in a laboratory to the original Covid strain that was identified in Wuhan last year, along with the two variants, to compare how the viruses behave after infection.

Omicron replicated faster in the bronchus — tubes connecting the windpipe and lungs — suggesting people with the strain may be more infectious.

Higher viral loads nearer the throat means people are more likely to breathe out viral particles.

Delta was found to duplicate much quicker in the lungs, where more of the virus can lead to the most severe illness.

The finding may be the biological clue behind why doctors insist people infected with the strain only suffer cold-like symptoms.

The reader will notice that there is no discussion about how the pathogen infects the bronchus. We don’t know how it is different to an infection that a bout of bronchitis consists of. This might not just be down to the usual avoidance of the topic of ACE2: the infection being discussed might be one that doesn’t even involve the protein as a factor.  Indeed, when considering the above information in conjunction with that which is about to be shared, the author posits that what is being told of is “omicron’s” lack of capability to do what a SARS coronavirus is supposed to do (ergo, it is not a SARS coronavirus).

Consider the following extract, which is from SKY News reporting on an interview with “Professor” Ravi Gupta, of the Cambridge Institute for Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Diseases:

He said: “Some experiments that have been done in different groups are suggesting that the virus has kind of altered the way it infects cells.

“This is again potentially due to some mutations that have occurred, and there may, and this is a big caveat, there may be a slightly different profile for this virus [compared to Delta].

There are no details given, of course, about how “omicron” has changed the way that it infects cells – but this is something that the author will now be on the hunt for, fully expecting some kind of relegation for ACE2 from existence only in medical research papers (and definitely not in alternative media) to a full state of oblivion as so-called scientists uncritically accept the evolution. Potentially, it will be an investigation that will find transformation on an Orwellian scale of ludicrousness for the purpose of increasingly desperate political expediency.

Another indicator in the fundamental change in nature of “omicron” from “delta” “Covid-19” is the alteration in a pattern of hospital admissions, about which a very brief follow up article to this piece is planned. Fortunately, the aforementioned Gupta of Sky interview notoriety presents an opportunity for a segue:

Prof Gupta told Sky News: “The sheer numbers that are going to be affected because of the increased transmissibility of this virus is going to potentially overwhelm our health service. So that’s a really critical situation that we’re facing.”

He added: “Even if the vaccines protect us to a significant degree, then the increased transmissibility and penetration of the virus into communities that we’re seeing already is putting a large amount of pressure (on the NHS) because a very small fraction of a very large number still translates to significant numbers being hospitalised.”

Evidently, Gupta is another purveyor of invisible cloth, and what he actually appears to be talking about, reader, is cold sufferers being translated into full blown disease victims in the name of flogging the dead pandemic.

At least the dead horse had once been alive.

† It has been observed in other places on the internet that the “Covid-19 pandemic” is driven by globalist non-governmental organisations, and that UK Government does as it is told, like any other national government. However, the experience of the Skirpal psychological operation should inform that the UK Government can wring out of any Switzerland-based body any directive as it pleases to suit its version of events or agenda, and the author suggests that this is all to do with Swiss Freemasonry being affiliated with the City of London.