Proposal: No terror in the UK because the Krypteia is being killed by the Russians
See also, In Ukraine, The British Krypteia Appears To Be Getting A Comeuppance; etc.
In November, at the end of day on the 13th, a whole twelve months will have passed without an attack officially recognised as “terror” having happened in the UK. This will be a record for a duration of time without one in the modern supposed “Islamist/White-supremacist terrorist” era, as the following article demonstrates.
The incident staged out of Woolwich Barracks in which the supposed Lee Rigby was supposedly murdered occurred in 22nd May, 2013. At this site this act was called the precursor to the ISIS psychological operation, and although it certainly did mark a shift so that “Islamist terror” was updated to become associated with UK Government’s pressing geopolitical situation in Syria, it really wasn’t until the apparent murder of Helen Leadbeater (Jo Cox) on 16th June, 2016 when the new order began. The Batley incident was said to be a rejoinder to the Woolwich one so that the latter is officially reckoned to be a generative moment for the development of “far-right” politics into the so-called realm of terror. There’s also a fundamental big difference that sets a demarcation between the epochs in that the Woolwich caper, and “Islamist terror” in general, was about enabling aggression in foreign fields. However, the Batley happening heralded the emergence of a “real domestic threat” because it was designed to incriminate a huge swathe of the population whose politics could be tarred which the same brush as that with which the violence against a politician (supposedly) was daubed into the traumatised national consciousness. An elaboration of this idea is presented in the article, Jo Cox Incident Periphery; Part Two: The BNP As Cointelpro Shooting Gallery, and it is recommended to the reader.
In any case, if one looks at the list as complied by Wikipedia of terror attacks in the UK (to be found at the foot of the page), it is clear that the largest gap in time between incidents since June of 2016 is occurring now – if one makes a necessary qualification for the interval that occurred due to the economic blockade, otherwise known as the “pandemic” mitigation measures.
The lockdown of March 2020 was eased in May, June and the start of July and the reader will remember that a recognisable level of normalcy returned for the summer of 2020. A second, slightly different kind of lockdown, with the one persistent aspect being masking, started in October 2020, and lasted to May 2021 (when limited indoor mixing was “allowed”). The Reading stabbings that happened in June of 2020 were not covered at this site, but should not have been overlooked because quite obviously, taking place in a park as they did, at a time when the outdoors had been “deemed permissible”, the incident was clearly meant to have an impact on the choices that people were making about not participating in the unsanctioned behaviour that UK Government had depended on people volunteering into to create the appearance of a public health crisis.
Obviously, with no further use for terrorism during the “pandemic” period, and with the risk of diluting the focus of fear, UK Government paused its operations for 15 full months until the murder of David Amess. The alternative explanation is that all the would-be terrorists suddenly became desirous to safeguard the greater good and developed a spirit of responsibility for the wellbeing of the all-community (the one they hate) so that they thought it would be a dastardly act to attack a symbolic NHS Nightingale stage set hospital, for instance. Indeed, the attack that should have happened during lockdown was the last one to have occurred in this list compiled by Wikipedia.
All that being said, from a perspective of official narrative, whereby it could be argued that would-be terrorists didn’t have the opportunities to prepare and stage their acts of violence and were restricted by physical constraints of lockdown, it means that the window in which an attack could take place (after the Reading stabbings) closed in October 2020, and only opened again in May 2021. To be official about it, then, there was effectively only about 8 months between the Reading stabbings and the penultimate one on the list in terms of the opportunity being available to act.
Again, then, on 13th November, a whole year will have passed without a “terror” attack, and the cause for it must be how the Russian Special Military Operation is drawing away the blood and treasure, to be wasted in Ukrainian fields, of the people who would otherwise perform the terror. These people at this site are collectively dubbed the Krypteia – please perform a search to read more – and they were evidently similarly occupied in the long duration between the Woolwich and Batley incidents because of being drawn to Syria for the perpetration of the ISIS psychological operation. Note, the rise of ISIS (2014) and the entry of Russia into the war to force a ceasefire (2015/16) and to disallow the purchase that the UK Government was looking to gain from the ISIS psyop, and eventually to thwart the entirety of the scheme, is neatly framed by the Woolwich and Batley incidents.
This time around in Ukraine, however, there appears to be a vulnerability not experienced even in the thick of the fighting in Syria, because UK special forces and intelligence agents are seemingly in much greater danger of being killed because of a need, not just to have them lead, but also to occupy firing positions.
This subject was one discussed this week by Andrey Bayevsky, a Lieutenant Colonel of the Donetsk People’s Militia and also a politician in the same country, when he spoke to the Russian news agency, TASS:
Earlier it was the involvement of Western specialists at the level of military planning and control of their execution in brigades, regiments, sometimes descending to battalions. Now it is the direct involvement, under the guise of mercenaries, of Western military specialists in the area of air defense from the Ukrainian side. This also applies to special operations forces and any high-tech or technically complex type of weapons supplied by the West.
Incidentally, this site told its readership to expect UK personnel to be involved in the leadership of Ukrainian forces in the piece from March, 2022, entitled, Mercenaries And Citizen Soldiers In Ukraine, And Suspecting The Talking Point To Be About Establishing Cover For “Our Boys”. Comment has also been made at this site as to how UK personnel might be expected to be accompanying certain equipment, such as in the article, The Attack On The Yavorov International Peacekeeping And Security Centre; Part Two: Making Waste Of US/UK “Capabilities”.
Somewhat of a surprise to the author, however, has been the evident depth of involvement of UK personnel as revealed in numerous accounts, not least one by an Mi7 outlet (as we shall see), about who formed the vanguard of the Ukrainian manoeuvre into what had been Russian-held Kharkov; Bayevsky seems to refer to how this knowledge came about: “We can see video and hear radio intercepts, they themselves post this video”. The Russians heard English being spoken in British accents. The video being referred to is quite possibly the one that even the Daily Mail reported on:
Soldiers with British accents have been filmed fighting in Ukrainian colours as the country makes stunning advances against Russian forces.
These, then, are British in Ukrainian uniforms who Bayevsky pointedly says are “masquerading” as mercenaries. It means, essentially, that they are serving armed forces or military intelligence personnel (because there are only two options for what a foreign soldier in Ukraine must be).
The real situation of UK military personnel in Ukrainian ranks is what the Russian Ministry of Defence appears to be suggesting when it did something it rarely does this week and specified in one its briefings the nationality of a number of “mercenaries” killed in the Krasny Liman direction:
In addition, a high-precision attack launched by Russian Aerospace Forces has resulted in the elimination of up to 100 militants from nationalist groups, and mercenaries, including about 40 mercenaries from the USA, United Kingdom, and Poland.
The author would suggest that the Russians knew the nationality of the people they killed because they had made a special point of knowing about their location after obtaining a fundamental appreciation of their nature at an earlier juncture in time. This seems more plausible than the possibility that a drone espied particular insignia on the uniform of dead bodies, or that the nationalities of the dead could be betrayed in the aftermath by communications made earlier in the battle. However, whichever is the case, for the Russians to make a specific point of naming the three countries who, in the chatter, are the main culprits for having serving personnel on the ground at the same time as TASS delivered its Bayevsky piece is quite telling.
Again – though – it’s not that the Russians would ever make clear distinctions about “Ukrainian” dead so that grounds for formal complaint arise (when these do arise, it seems, they are to be used for behind-the-scenes diplomatic pressure [the Russian accusations of UK leadership in the Nord Stream gas pipeline sabotage and a drone attack on navy ships in Sevastopol have very much gone behind the scenes]). Indeed, this has all been covered before: for the Russians, it seems, anyone or anything that wants to appear to be Ukrainian is liable to be eliminated – quite without concern of causing an international incident – as if it is one.
The knock-on effect of this situation is revolutionary, even if the moronic masses of Britain can’t appreciate it (and because they can’t is why it won’t be exploited). It’s all quite simple: if its operatives are being rendered powerless by Russia in foreign fields – especially if they are being exterminated – then this is even more reason why the Kryptiea can’t be organising terror schemes at home.
As mentioned at the top of this, the following list is from the Wikipedia page (List of terrorist incidents in Great Britain). The reader will find that most of these incidents have been covered at FBEL, and links to the coverage are compiled in the presentation entitled, #ControlledDemolition. Additionally, coverage of the Liverpool Women’s Hospital bombing and the David Amess murder is linked to below the list. (Also see Targeting Assad Through The Islamic State: The Great Hoax Of 2014).
2016, 16 June: Murder of Jo Cox – Thomas Mair
8 full months
2017, 22 March: 2017 Westminster attack – Khalid Masood
2 full months
2017, 22 May: Manchester Arena bombing – Salman Abedi
0 full months
2017, 3 June: 2017 London Bridge attack – Khuram Shazad Butt et al
0 full months
2017, 19 June: Finsbury Park attack – Darren Osborne
2 full months
2017, 15 September: Parsons Green bombing – Ahmed Hassan
11 full months
2018, 14 August: Westminster car attack – Salih Khater
4 full months
2018, 31 December: Manchester Victoria station stabbings – Mahdi Mohamud
10 full months
2019, 29 November: London Bridge stabbing – Usman Khan
1 full month
2020, 9 January: Whitemoor prison (Cambridgeshire) stabbing – Brusthom Ziamani et al
0 Full months
2020, 2 February: Streatham stabbing – Sudesh Amman
4 full months
2020, 20 June: Reading stabbings – Khairi Saadallah
See above note.
2021, 15 October: Murder of David Amess – Ali Harbi Ali
1 full month
2021, 14 November: Liverpool Women’s Hospital bombing – Emad Al-Swealmeen
12 full months on 13th November – and counting thereafter.
* * * * * *
Although this article had been promised as being about how the features of the explosion, in last Sunday’s Liverpool Women’s Hospital “terror” incident, undermined what was being claimed about a “bomb” More…
When Emad Al Swealmeen “set off a bomb” outside a hospital on “Remembrance Sunday” (just before the oh-so symbolic 11-o-clock signal to worship the transfigured sacrifice in the temple ritual that takes More…
The Liverpool Women’s Hospital incident; Part One: One Born Every Time
Evidently, the Liverpool Women’s Hospital was featured in a Channel 4 television show called “One Born Every Minute”. The title is perhaps to do with how the institution in question is a maternity hospital, More…
The murder of David Amess, and the strange possibility of a missing patsy
In a tweet that he pinned to the top of his Twitter output, David Amess announced that appointments to meet him at his constituency surgery could be made by telephone or email. The surgery, of course, was the one More…
What with it staffing “Covid-19 vaccination” centres, and with it propagandising through its psychological warfare units for to create the impression of a virulent disease that actually doesn’t exist in that More…
