The continued terror respite in the UK as Russia puts “far-right extremism” to the sword
Having been premature in calling it at this time last year, with the same proviso that the interval between 2020 and 2021 in which terror was absent (so as not to dilute the psychological impact of the mask-wearing phase of the “Covid-19” pretext for economic blockade) does not count in the reckoning, it can now be claimed that the longest time has passed without an executed incident in Great Britain, in the modern “Islamism provoking ‘far-right’” era of terrorism and since the “attack on Helen Leadbeater” incident which defines the epoch.
It has now been a full 13 months since the so-called Dover firebombing attack, and also a full 24 months in which there has only been one executed act of terrorism – also a record of its type since 2016.
If one reads the original article on the subject of November 2022, and also the update to it of June 2023, one will see the provision of an explanation for the reason in the dearth of terror attacks – which, simply stated, proposes that the UK Government’s capacity to organise, lead and carry out acts of false flag terror in the name of Islamism or the “far right” has been dramatically curtailed by the Russian Special Military Operation (SMO) in the Donbas.
A fuller explanation beyond this summary is available in said articles, and an extensive recap won’t be given here, except to present some additional support for the notion that Russia is eliminating UK Government personnel who would otherwise be the ultimate culprits for domestic terror.
Overlooked at the time of abovementioned June FBEL piece, it was in May 2023 when the Guardian carried a story, which covered a report by a research group concerned with listing secret operations of its Armed Forces in places where the UK has not been formally party to a conflict, Action on Armed Violence, that 50 spies/soldiers of the various UK special operation forces had been active in Ukraine during the course of the SMO. This, of course, would amount to a gross underrating – it is surely the case, borne out of certain operational necessities, that many more personnel from all sorts of branches of the UK Armed Forced have been present in Ukraine.
Moreover, information is coming to light that shows how the UK partnership with Ukrainian forces, particularly in the realm of covert and Intelligence agency led operations – so that, in fact, the said partnership is in the form of secretive UK leadership of a full proxy – is one that has been in long-time surreptitious existence.
Such a thing would explain the rumoured presence of Ukrainian forces in Syria posing, as their UK counterparts did, as rebels opposed to the Assad government (the abovementioned Guardian article states how Matt Tonroe, the SAS man whose death was covered at FBEL, would have been in Syria “to help rebel groups fighting against President Bashar al-Assad”), and its being rescued by Russian intervention. In fact, the masterminds behind the contents of the “Discord leaks” of supposed Pentagon documents in April 2023 could have drawn on knowledge of historical and real Ukrainian special operations in Syria as early as 2014 (a time when the Euromaidan would have been coinciding with the ISIS uprising) so they were able to think up the idea of an Ukrainian plan, allegedly never put into effect, of opening a front of the SMO targeting Russian forces in the Middle Eastern country.
What’s interesting in terms of the immediate subject of this article about the UK’s apparent dead hand behind the Ukrainian military and utilisation of the same in underhanded and dastardly schemes to enforce the Rules Based International Order is the “coincidence” one discovers when one looks at the Wikipedia list of terror incidents in Great Britain without – as the author has done – overlooking what could be called the outlier terror attack – one predating the Batley incident and coming in order ahead of the Woolwich one – of the era in which, on the face of it, tension caused by Islamism has generated a “far-right” response in kind.
In a period between 29th April and 12th July, 2013, Pavlo Lapshyn, a Ukrainian in Britain, under the cover of being an exchange student at Coventry University, and an employee and resident (living on company premises) at a Birmingham software company originating from spooky Cambridge University, killed a Muslim man in Small Heath by stabbing, and then detonated “home-made bombs” outside of mosques in Walsall, Wolverhampton and Tipton.
It doesn’t take much analysis to suppose that Lapshyn, with his 40-years prison tariff, took the fall for a broader, multi-manned operation. That being said, the case deserves much more attention than it has been given, and coverage is planned at FBEL at some future date.
The point that is being made at this time with this brief introduction is to notice the dates of Lapshyn’s rampage, and the rough correlation with a time when Ukrainian entry into the sphere of control from London was about to come into the open, and also a time when the anti-Russian axis was preparing its ISIS plans for the completion of its invasion of Syria. Of great import in this dynamic is our previously noted National Action (largely formed out of the ranks of the British Army) connection with the Azov Brigade and institutionalised Ukrainian “Kurganism” (a Slavic Aryanism from the same cultic fount that produced Nazism and British Israelism) which UK Government is entirely afraid of being exposed, so we can see that British “far-right” terrorism has a distinctive anti-Russian axis flavour to it. It is entirely fitting, then, that the Russians should be the power by which the UK Government becomes unable to inflict “far-right” terrorism upon the British people, and then unable – as per the otherwise design – to blame them for it.
